Spaces
Understand how people find their way, use facilities and interact with services in your spaces. Identify the barriers that make a visit harder than it needs to be.
Space research
See the space through the people using it
A space can look well designed and still be difficult to use. Visitors may miss an entrance, misunderstand a sign, join the wrong queue or struggle to find help. Staff may know the layout so well that these difficulties are easy to overlook.
UX Pacific researches the experience of physical environments: how people arrive, move, complete tasks and leave. We connect their actions and feedback with the information, facilities and service interactions around them. The result is evidence your team can use to prioritise experience improvements.
When to research
When space experience research is useful
Study a space before opening, during a redesign or when an existing location is generating confusion, repeated requests for help or difficult service interactions. Research can focus on one route or task, a complete visit, or comparable experiences across several locations.
Relevant environments include retail stores, bank branches, offices, campuses, hospitality venues, transport facilities and public-service locations. In sensitive settings such as clinics, access and participant safeguards need to suit the environment. A single-site business and a multi-location enterprise may need different scopes, but both need a clear research question.
What we investigate
Questions we help you answer
Can first-time visitors find the entrance and understand where to go? Do signs and layouts help people choose the right route? Is it clear where to wait, check in or ask for assistance? Which tasks require unnecessary walking, repeated explanations or help from staff? How does the experience differ for people with access needs or limited familiarity with the location?
We also examine connections with digital touchpoints: does a booking message prepare someone for the visit, can they use a kiosk, and can they move from self-service to human assistance? A difficulty may come from the space, its information or its service process, so we investigate rather than assume.
-
01
Arrival and orientation
Explore entrances, reception, check-in and the first information people encounter. Understand whether visitors can connect their pre-visit expectations with what they find on arrival.
-
02
Routes, signs and destinations
Study how people choose routes, interpret signs and locate facilities or service points. Observe hesitation, backtracking and requests for help, then explore their explanations instead of treating movement alone as proof of confusion.
-
03
Waiting and completing the task
Examine queues, seating, counters, displays and shared facilities. Explore whether people understand their turn, can hear or read relevant information, and have the support needed to complete their visit.
-
04
Comfort, assistance and departure
Investigate reported comfort, privacy and sensory difficulties alongside the use of help points and exit routes. If technical measurements of lighting, sound or environmental conditions are required, those need a separately agreed specialist scope.
Who and when
Plan for different visitors and conditions
A frequent visitor may navigate differently from a first-time visitor. Staff, customers, companions and delivery personnel may have different tasks. We agree which groups to include and consider relevant differences in language, mobility, sensory needs and familiarity.
Timing also matters. A quiet walkthrough may not reflect a busy period. The study plan identifies relevant visit conditions and records what was actually studied. Across locations or markets, we document differences in layouts, service models and visitor needs before comparing findings.
Our approach
Research in the right setting
Contextual observation can reveal how people use a location. Guided walkthroughs and task-based sessions explore agreed routes and activities. Field research and intercept interviews capture feedback near the experience, where permission and voluntary participation can be arranged.
Interviews, journey mapping and relevant service records can add context. For a proposed space, plans, models or mock-ups may help investigate expectations and information, but cannot fully reproduce movement, crowding or comfort in a built environment. We choose methods according to the decision and explain these limits.
From insight to action
From observations to improvement priorities
We begin with your location, intended users and the decision you need to make. We agree the routes, tasks, visit conditions, access permissions and outputs. Findings then connect user difficulties with the relevant touchpoints and available evidence.
Your team receives priorities for discussion, such as clearer information, better assistance or changes to a service handover. Physical alterations require assessment by the appropriate design, facilities or engineering specialists. Follow-up research can examine whether an agreed change improves the experience under comparable conditions.
The output
What your team receives
Agreed deliverables can include a visitor journey map, route-level findings, signage comprehension issues, access-related experience barriers and prioritised improvement opportunities. Annotated plans or consented visual examples may help explain where a difficulty occurs.
The findings describe affected users, observed conditions and evidence supporting each priority. A handoff discussion helps operations, facilities, service and design teams agree next steps. Outputs and any comparisons between sites are specified before the study begins.
Research in context
Different visitors, locations and markets
A frequent visitor may navigate differently from a first-time visitor, and a quiet walkthrough may not reflect a busy period. Across locations or markets, we document differences in layouts, service models and visitor needs before comparing findings.
Find the right service
Choose the service around your question
Explore Space Experience Research for a focused study of a physical environment. Retail & Shopper Experience addresses shopping tasks, while Accessibility & Inclusion investigates barriers for relevant user groups. Where the question extends across a visit and its supporting channels, consider Journey Experience.
Research principles
Responsible fieldwork and clear boundaries
Fieldwork requires appropriate site permissions, participant safeguards and recording arrangements. We agree how to handle bystanders, confidential areas and sensitive information, and plan research so it does not obstruct essential activities.
Space experience research is not a building-code inspection, accessibility certification, fire-safety assessment or structural audit. Findings inform experience decisions within the agreed scope. Qualitative observation does not establish total footfall or population-wide behaviour, and user feedback does not guarantee commercial outcomes.
Before we begin
Frequently asked questions
Can we study a space before it opens?
Yes. Plans, prototypes or accessible mock-ups can support early questions. We identify which findings need validation in the completed space under realistic conditions.
Can you compare several locations?
Yes, subject to access and execution feasibility. We agree comparable tasks and conditions, while documenting local differences that may explain the results.
Will research tell us exactly how to redesign the building?
Research identifies experience problems and opportunities. Architectural design, construction feasibility and technical compliance require the relevant specialists; these are not implied by a user experience study.
What should we share to get started?
Tell us about the space, its users, known difficulties, target locations and the decision you need to make. Include available plans, timing and access restrictions. You do not need to choose a method before contacting us.
Let us help shape the next step
Understand your space experience.
Find what needs attention.
Tell us where visitors struggle.