Define the decisions
Agree the experience, audience, context and questions.
Understand your experience in the language, routines and everyday context of the people using it.
Inclusive & Cross-Market Experiences
An experience can be translated correctly and still feel unfamiliar or difficult to use. Cultural and local experience research explores how people interpret information, make decisions and use products or services in their own settings. It helps your team understand context before deciding what to adapt.
What we look at
How we study it
When to research
Use this research when introducing an experience to a new audience, reviewing a localised version or investigating feedback that your existing research does not explain. Questions may involve confusing terminology, unfamiliar interactions, support expectations or how a product fits everyday routines.
Studies can focus on a language community, region, user group or service setting. They may concern products, digital interfaces, spaces, systems or service journeys. The focus is the experience of using them, rather than general market sizing or a catalogue of cultural stereotypes.
Global research
Relevant context may include the words people use, shared responsibilities, available devices, connectivity, payment practices and routes to support. Research explores which of these matter for the task, and how they interact with the product or service.
A difficulty may come from an unfamiliar convention, limited infrastructure, previous experience or an interface problem. We consider alternative explanations instead of automatically attributing it to culture. Differences within a community can be as important as differences between markets.
Our approach
Recruitment reflects the audience and experience being studied. Relevant variation can include language, location, role, age, prior use and access needs. We discuss recruitment feasibility and avoid relying only on people who are easiest to reach or most confident discussing the topic.
Interviews explore recent examples and expectations. Contextual observation examines use in a relevant setting. Diaries or participant-led photo activities may help document routines over time. Usability and content testing can examine a localised experience directly. Methods are selected for the question and participation requirements.
From context to opportunity
Agree the experience, audience, context and questions.
Examine existing materials and identify what needs evidence rather than inference.
Confirm language support, recruitment, scenarios and practical arrangements.
Explore specific experiences, observe relevant tasks and invite alternative perspectives.
Compare accounts, examine exceptions and distinguish observations from interpretation.
Connect findings to candidate changes and questions requiring further testing.
The output
Depending on scope, outputs can include context and routine summaries, language or interpretation findings, evidence-backed barriers and prioritised localisation opportunities. Approved examples help product, content and service teams understand the situation behind a recommendation.
Reports explain audiences, locations, methods, evidence gaps and limitations. A findings discussion helps teams agree next steps and appropriate follow-up tests. Report languages, editable outputs, translation work and implementation are agreed separately.
Research focus
Research can explore how people understand labels, instructions, examples, symbols and tone. Participants explain information in their own words or use it during realistic tasks. This helps distinguish wording that sounds natural from wording that supports the intended action.
Local-language moderation and interpretation requirements are agreed during planning. Important expressions are reviewed in context, with translation uncertainty documented. Research guides localisation decisions; final translation production and specialist approval are separately scoped.
Research focus
Participants receive understandable information about the study, recording and use of material. We agree suitable locations, communication preferences and options to pause or stop. Home or workplace access does not automatically permit recording other people, private documents or unrelated activities.
Research avoids unnecessary questions about sensitive identities or beliefs. Any participant-generated photos or recordings need clear boundaries. Findings should describe experiences respectfully and protect individuals from being identified through small-group details.
Research in context
Recommendations may concern language, examples, information formats, support routes or the sequence of a task. We explain what evidence supports the adaptation and what could remain consistent. A local preference does not automatically justify a product change; user impact and feasibility are discussed with your team.
Where several locations are studied, shared questions can support synthesis. Differences in recruitment, product versions and conditions are documented before comparison. Findings from one setting are not presented as universal local requirements.
Before we begin
No. Translation may be one part of the study, but research also explores use, routines, expectations and practical constraints. A linguistic review and a user experience study answer different questions.
Yes, subject to recruitment and access feasibility. A focused study can address priority questions. Coverage and conclusions remain tied to the people and settings studied.
No. Qualitative findings explain experiences but do not establish population percentages or future demand. Research informs adaptations; retesting and post-launch measurement can help assess their effect.
Let us help shape the next step
Next research service Cross-Market Experience Understand the local context. Make better-informed experience decisions. Contact Us Share your audience and the experience you want to study.